 |
 |
|
|
Volume 10, Number 3, April 27, 2004
This issue of the BOMA San
Francisco Advocate is brought to
you by

San
Francisco Board of Supervisors Passes
Formula Retail (Chain Store) Restrictions
Supervisor Matt Gonzalez
pushed through his formula
retail ban/restrictions
legislation several weeks ago with
a veto-proof 8-3 vote by the Board
of Supervisors. This legislation
will totally ban chain stores in
Hayes Valley and Cole Valley and
set strict citywide notification
requirements (conditional use permits)
on all so-called “formula” (read:
chain store) stores who have 11
or more outlets worldwide.
Formula retail stores are defined
as stores with the same merchandise,
employee uniforms, signage, logos,
architectural design, color scheme
or similar standardized features.
The new ordinance will require that
all such retail outlets in neighborhood
commercial districts apply for a
conditional use permit, even though
the space may have previously been
approved for a similar use. It allows
the local community (both competing
businesses and residents) the opportunity
to extract concessions or additional
“contributions” for the privilege
of setting up shop in their area.
The full fiscal impact of this legislation
was never measured and cannot be
determined at this time. BOMA is
hopeful that some sort of modifying
legislation can be considered in
the near future that will only require
new “formula retail” stores to notify
the neighboring businesses and residents,
rather than subject their project
to a conditional use permit. However,
for the time being, San Francisco
has pulled in the “welcome mat”
to all chain stores…
San
Francisco Supervisors Consider Registration
for Permit Expediters – Table Idea
for Now
The Board of Supervisor’s Rules
Committee earlier last week tabled
a measure that would have required
many permit consultants
to register with the city as a lobbyist
to act as liaisons between the building
department and their clients’ architects,
engineers, or owners. This complicated,
costly and unnecessary legislation
would have required each consultant
to annually register with the city
as a lobbyist, and pay a fee for
him/herself, as well as another
fee for each client each year. BOMA
protested that the Department of
Building Inspection had just recently
put a new automated permit tracking
system into service, and that the
city should wait and see if this
new process will provide the transparency
and equal service to all applicants
that it was designed to do. BOMA
also urged the Committee members
to allow time for the Mayor’s Special
Envoy, Rudy Nothenberg,
to complete his analysis of the
department’s permit processes before
new rules and restrictions are applied
to it. BOMA applauds Supervisor
Sophie Maxwell’s decision to table
the measure for the time being and
to further study its potential negative
ramifications.
New
Tax Proposals Being Considered by
San Francisco Board of Supervisors
Supervisor Fiona Ma
released her final report from her
Revenue Advisory Panel
last week and it was not welcome
news to the business community or
commercial property owners. Although
the panel never reached any consensus
on whether (much less which) taxes
should be raised in San Francisco,
a straw poll was taken of the participants,
and several new or increased taxes
surfaced as the majority favorites:
increasing the Vehicle Licensing
Fee, increasing payroll
taxes to include partnership
distributions, and adding a new
gross receipts tax.
Second tier favorites were increasing
the real estate transfer
tax, adding a local parcel
tax on both residential
and commercial properties, and adding
a residential utility tax.
It wasn’t all bad, however, as several
ideas to stimulate the local economy
did surface: give biotech/nanotech
firms a payroll tax holiday
for a set number of years as they
develop their products, and to charge
rental property owners a one time
fee to be able to sell their units
to existing tenants. This tenant
homebuyer program would
also increase the value of the real
estate converted from rental units
to condos thus reaping the city
higher property tax income for years
into the future. Any tax proposals
will have to be approved by the
voters in November before becoming
effective in 2005.
San
Francisco Supervisors Consider Higher
Developer Fees
For the past 23 years, the city
has enacted a so-called Transit
Impact Development Fee
(TIDF) on new commercial office
building construction in the downtown
area, ostensibly to pay for the
improvements to the local transportation
system that would be necessary as
a consequence of the new building
and its additional people. That
fee has been set at $5 per square
foot, and it has not changed. Now,
Supervisor Jake McGoldrick
wants to take the TIDF citywide,
and to assess it against all types
of new developments, except residential.
His proposal calls for $35
per square foot on new retail development,
$14 /psf on new office buildings,
hospitals, educational and cultural
projects, and $9/psf on new hotels
and production/distribution/repair
facilities. According to his staff,
there will be an effort to bring
these initial fee hike proposals
down to perhaps $10.50/psf for every
type of development except retail
and office, which would be charged
$12.75 per square foot. The new
ordinance also calls for annual
cost of living adjustments, and
will exempt out any new developments
under 3,000 square feet in size.
The BOMA Government and Public Affairs
Committee as well as the association’s
political action committee have
rejected any fee hikes on new developments
at this time, and call upon the
Supervisor to refrain from increasing
any costs to do business in San
Francisco during this down economy.
The first hearing on the TIDF increases
is reportedly set for May 10th at
the Supervisor’s Land Use Committee.
New
SF Fire Chief Joanne Hayes-White
Meets With BOMA
The first appointment made by Mayor
Gavin Newsom was the elevation of
Joanne Hayes-White to Chief of the
San Francisco Fire Department. BOMA
has had a long and supportive relationship
with the Fire Department, starting
with our association’s founding
several years after the 1906 Fire
and Earthquake. BOMA also assists
the Firefighters Toy Program every
Christmas/Holiday Season by placing
barrels for toys in all of our downtown
buildings for several weeks, which
results in thousands of toys each
year being contributed for underprivileged
kids in the city. However, BOMA
has only had intermittent meetings
with the Department to review/respond
to possible code changes or policy/procedure
changes that might impact our many
high rise office buildings. With
the elevation of Joanne Hayes-White,
BOMA saw an opportunity to establish
a closer relationship with the Fire
Department and to that end has held
several meetings with the Fire Chief
to lay out our suggestions for doing
just that. BOMA is particularly
interested in support from the Department
in the state adoption of the International
Codes. Last year the California
Building Standards Commission adopted
the National Fire Protection Association’s
building codes, to the shock of
every industry group (architects,
engineers, building officials, property
owners, and business owners) in
the state. With a new Governor,
there is hope this decision will
be reversed, and BOMA is seeking
assistance from the SFFD in this
regard. BOMA also wishes to assist
the Department in standardizing
its many procedures for enforcement
of local and state fire and life
safety codes. BOMA’s Building Codes
Task Force has also invited the
new Fire Marshal, Paul Chin, to
attend its monthly meetings at the
BOMA Office.
BOMA’s
Standard Method of Floor Measurement
Seminar April 29th—Last Chance to
Sign Up!
Don’t miss this valuable
seminar which will interpret the
set of area calculations produced
by BOMA International for tenant
space rents. Accepted by the American
National Standards Institute (ANSI),
these floor measurement tools will
help you and your tenants understand
their obligations under the lease
for common areas, etc. Learn why
an annual maintenance of a building’s
area calculations is necessary as
leases turn over. The seminar will
be presented by Gordon L’Estrange,
of Ottolini, Booth & Associates,
architects, and the Chair of BOMA’s
Building Codes Task Force. This
three hour seminar will be held
at San Francisco State University
Downtown Center, 425 Market Street,
Room 2608, beginning at 8:15 a.m.
Registration costs $85 for members,
and $95 for non-members, and can
be done online at www.bomasf.org.
Do it now!
DBI
Preparing Procedures for Sprinkler
Retrofit Ordinance Extensions
At a special meeting of the Building
Department and Fire Departments
April 1, Laurence Kornfield, the
City’s Chief Building Inspector,
detailed the issues surrounding
the city’s sprinkler retrofit ordinance,
scheduled to go into full effect
February 15, 2006, and detailed
exactly which type of buildings
the ordinance applied to, and under
what conditions extensions might
be considered. Buildings are exempt
from this ordinance if they are
historical (and are included in
the book “Here Today”), are of mixed
occupancy (part residential/part
commercial, etc.), are R-1 buildings
except tourist hotels, or are residential
care facilities. Naturally, state
and federal buildings were also
exempt. For those commercial office
buildings who are covered, the following
things are absolutely required:
the sprinkler system must be approved
by the Fire Department, the system
must conform to Chapter 38 or the
1992 San Francisco Building Code
– which is now the 1999 NFPA 13,
the system must have shut off valves,
water detectors, and either onsite
or remote controls/supervision.
The risers, laterals, and other
installation elements must be correct,
and there must be adequate water
pressure to the building. For alternatives
or exceptions to the ordinance to
be considered, several factors must
be asked:
>
Has the alternative been proven
in a nationally recognized test?
> Is it physically impossible
to install sprinklers?
> Will it require a disproportionate
effort to comply?
> Will it cause an undue hardship
with little increase in safety
> Will the DBI and the SFFD approve
the alternative proposal?
BOMA
is also seeking a completion document
(letter) from the DBI which will
state when a building is 100% sprinkled.
This umbrella certification will
link all work done in a building
related to sprinkler systems and
have it verified and signed off
on by an engineer. Kornfield is
currently working on the department’s
procedures for reviewing and considering
any extensions. (415-558-6244)
BOMA’s
Annual Commercial Recycler of the
Year Awards Announced!
Twenty BOMA San Francisco office
buildings competed this year for
the title of “Best Commercial Recycler
of the Year”. The contest was, jointly
sponsored by the association and
the San Francisco Department of
the Environment, also included entries
from the Hotel Council of San Francisco
and the Golden Gate Restaurant Association.
The winners were announced at the
April 22 luncheon at the Palace
Hotel and presented cash awards
and “Golden Dumpsters” (created
by the Golden Gate Disposal and
Recycling Company). Recycled inscribed
glass plates were presented to the
2nd place winners, and certificates
were given to 3rd place recipients.
AND
THE WINNERS WERE…
Small
Buildings – under 270,000 sq. ft.
– 1st Place: 260 Townsend
Street (Swinerton Builders),
2nd Place: 255 California.
Medium
Buildings – 270,000 – 450,000 sq.
ft. – 1st Place: 100 Pine
Street (Unico Properties),
2nd Place: 101 Second St.
Large
Buildings – over 450,000 sq. ft.
– 1st Place: 2 Folsom Street
(GAP Inc.), 2nd Place: Post
Montgomery Center.
Large
Hotels - 1st Place: San
Francisco Marriott
Medium
Hotels - 1st Place: Fairmont
Hotel San Francisco
Small
Hotels - 1st Place: Hotel
Cosmo
Large
Restaurants – Over 50 employees
- 1st Place: Scoma’s
Medium
Restaurants – 21 to 50 employees
- 1st Place: Anchor Brewing
Company
Small
Restaurants – Under 21 employees
– 1st Place: Urban Forage
A
luncheon also featured a presentation
by David Gottfried,
author of “Greed to Green”, who
was a founder of the U.S. Green
Buildings Council and the LEED standards
for grading a building’s environmental
sustainability. Jared Blumenfeld,
the Director for the city’s Department
of the Environment, and Supervisor
Sophie Maxwell rounded
out the program. Anne Miller (Unico
Properties) chaired the Awards Luncheon
and created the powerpoint presentation
of all award winners.
Congratulations to all the
winners!
Building
in San Mateo? Attend BOMA’s May
4th Luncheon on County Green Building
GuidelinesOwners, architects, urban
designers, landscapers, and green
building enthusiasts will want to
attend BOMA’s May 4th luncheon in
San Mateo at which the county’s
newly published “Sustainable Buildings
Guidelines” will be reviewed by
its authors, San Francisco architects
Richard Parker,
and Raphael Sperry
of 450 Architects. Greening a building
simply means taking the environment
into account during design and construction.
Green buildings are more energy
efficient, conserve water, use durable,
non-toxic, and incorporate as much
recycled content as possible. They
are designed to maximize natural
light, utilize space most efficiently,
and promote
waste recycling. A “green building”
will have lower operating costs
which translate into savings for
both the owner and the building’s
tenants. Better still: you are reducing
any harmful impacts on the environment
produced by the building’s construction.
Sign
up at www.bomasf.org
today! Location: Radisson Villa
Hotel, San Mateo, 11:30 – 1:30 p.m.
$40 in advance.
Rob
Reiner/California Teachers Association
Drops State Initiative to Raise
Commercial Real Estate Taxes
Recently, it was announced that
Rob Reiner, the Hollywood actor/director
in association with the California
Teachers Association were dropping
their effort to place a measure
on the November state ballot which
would have raised the commercial
tax rate on properties from 1% to
1.55% annually. The cited reasons
were several: too many other measures
on the ballot will be asking the
state’s voters to raise taxes in
a number of areas, and the possibility
of Governor Schwarzenegger’s
waging an opposition campaign against
it. The California Chamber of Commerce,
the California Business Properties
Association, BOMA and numerous other
groups lauded the action taken by
Reiner/CTA in withdrawing the initiative.
Recent polls showing a heightened
voter opposition to tax hikes also
caused another group to pull a measure
that would have levied a $550 million
increase in phone taxes to pay for
emergency health programs. Proponents
of the tax hike on commercial properties
estimated the 1.55% would rake in
an additional $5.4 billion annually.
Opponents stated the state’s businesses
could not afford that kind of hit
in these tough economic times. Taxes
can only be voted upon in general
elections every two years.
San
Francisco Collaborative Can Survey
Your Space for Accessibility, and
Save You Money!
Do you know of businesses or buildings
with accessibility issues? Do you
fear you may be sued one day for
non-compliance with strict disabled
access laws? If so, you might want
to look into the San Francisco Collaborative,
an alliance of small business and
disability consumer interests, including
the Independent Living Resource
Center of San Francisco. They will
do a survey of your “vulnerabilities”
and help you comply in the easiest
fashion possible. This technical
assistance is also very inexpensive
and the Collaborative can even offer
grants up to $500 toward those costs.
For more information, contact the
Independent Living Resource Center
at 415-543-6222 or email info@ilrcsf.org.
All survey information is kept confidential.
Upcoming
Events to Remember:
May 14th BOMA’s Disaster
Experience Seminar – A hands
on session to test your mettle under
extreme emergencies and to help
you create a plan to deal with building
crises involving your
tenants, the media, police, fire,
etc. 8 a.m. –
Noon; Hyatt Regency
June
2nd Small Business Network’s
Annual Dinner featuring Sunne
Wright McPeak, the Governor’s
Secretary for Business, Transportation
and Housing. 6
p.m., World Trade Center (behind
the Ferry Building) For Details
check out: www.sbnsf.org
.
|
|
|